Objects
Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2012. Context effects and observer: bias-implications for forensic odontology.
Chiam, Sher-Lin, Page, Mark, Higgins, Denice, Taylor, Jane. Elsevier; 2019. Validity of forensic odontology identification by comparison of conventional dental radiographs: A scoping review.
Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt. Elsevier; 2012. Reality bites: a ten-year retrospective analysis of bitemark casework in Australia.
Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2011. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I - a quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
Page, Mark, Lain, Russell, Kemp, Richard, Taylor, Jane. Elsevier; 2018. Validation studies in forensic odontology – Part 1: Accuracy of radiographic matching.
Chiam, Sher-Lin, Higgins, Denice, Colyvas, Kim, Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane. Elsevier; 2021. Interpretation, confidence and application of the standardised terms: Identified, Probable, Possible, Exclude and Insufficient in forensic odontology identification.
Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2013. Expert interpretation of bitemark injuries: a contemporary qualitative study.
Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2011. Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences: fact or fiction?.
Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2011. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II - judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability.